10w30 Oil in Saturn SL2

Discussion in 'Saturn S-series' started by K2NNJ, Feb 3, 2004.

  1. K2NNJ

    BANDIT2941 Guest

    Excuse me? Superior lubricant across a wider range of operating conditions?
    Yeah, really. His argument doesn't hold much weight considering he apparently
    thinks mobil 1 is 5w-30 only.

    Straight 30 when it gets cold is like molasses. I can see this guy hurting his
    engine in the wintertime.
     
    BANDIT2941, Feb 8, 2004
    #21
  2. K2NNJ

    K2NNJ Guest

    Basically in a nutshell, what most are saying is:

    Winter 5w30
    Summer 10w30

    I have a 99 SL2
     
    K2NNJ, Feb 8, 2004
    #22
  3. K2NNJ

    Napalm Heart Guest

    I just used some 30W to oil the breather filter on my 8N. The
    temperature was in the mid 20's and that stuff was awful thick.

    Ken
     
    Napalm Heart, Feb 9, 2004
    #23
  4. K2NNJ

    danco Guest

    Wintertime cold? What's that? Should those of us live in paradise (San Diego)
    where it gets below freezing less than a handful of times a year (during the wee
    hours of the night for a few hours at most each time it does so) be concerned
    about what happens to oil at low temperatures? I wonder.
     
    danco, Feb 9, 2004
    #24
  5. K2NNJ

    Steve Barker Guest

    Well you can THINK what you want. I've a fleet of 35 trucks have run
    nothing but 30W in them since I took over 7 years ago. The lowest mileage
    truck has 110k and the highest 295k. None of the engines have even had a
    valve cover off. Now the transmissions, well that's another story.....
     
    Steve Barker, Feb 9, 2004
    #25
  6. K2NNJ

    Steve Barker Guest

    There's nothing "tighter" about modern engines. They are in fact 'looser'
    to create less friction to keep the mileage specs as high as possible.
     
    Steve Barker, Feb 9, 2004
    #26
  7. K2NNJ

    Napalm Heart Guest

    What temperature range are they operating in?


     
    Napalm Heart, Feb 9, 2004
    #27
  8. K2NNJ

    Napalm Heart Guest

    Interesting that what you are saying goes directly against what a
    factory engineer and several GM trained mechanics have told me. Also,
    that race engines are built loose to maximize horsepower while
    sacrificing longevity.
     
    Napalm Heart, Feb 9, 2004
    #28
  9. K2NNJ

    C. E. White Guest

    It would be interesting to know exactly what you are basing this claim on. At
    the normal oil operating temperature (around 100 degrees C), straight 30
    weight and 10W30 and 5W30 all have very similar viscosities. Depending on the
    brand, they all have the same additive package. For an engine in good
    condition (no excessive blow-by) all three viscosities will usually tend to
    thicken with age and increasing usage. The only significant difference will
    the the low temperature viscosity. The 5W30 and the 10W30 will both be
    thicker at 0 degrees c than any of them are at the normal operating
    temperature but neither will be as thick as straight 30 weight at 0 degrees
    C. The straight 30 weight will be much more viscous than either when cold. It
    seems to me that I want an oil that flows well when cold and maintains its
    viscosity when hot. The 5W30 does this. If you are in a perpetually warm
    climate, then it probably doesn't matter which of the three oils you use.
    However, in a cold climate, I'd give the nod to the 5W30 other either of the
    other two. Comparitive specs for the three grades are readily available from
    most lubricant supplirer. One example is available from
    http://library.cbest.chevron.com/lu...87263c6a888256b56007a0487/$FILE/PCMO-2210.pdf

    Regards,

    Ed White
     
    C. E. White, Feb 9, 2004
    #29
  10. K2NNJ

    Napalm Heart Guest

    I also noticed that he used the term 30W (which I fell into, but then
    I'm an amateur), which isn't correct because it means that the oil
    meets the SAE standard for winter usage, which 30 weight oil doesn't.
    I would expect that a pro fleet manager would have known this.

    Ken
     
    Napalm Heart, Feb 9, 2004
    #30
  11. They are generally tighter.. if there's oil between moving parts (as there
    should be), there shouldn't be any real friction difference.

    One thing that could be described as "looser" is the use of lower-tension
    piston rings, which reduce the friction between the piston and cylinder
    walls. Same with newer piston designs with shorter skirts to reduce the
    potential contact area.
     
    Robert Hancock, Feb 10, 2004
    #31
  12. 30W would not be so bad in your area (Kansas, you said?), especially not for
    the usage typical of a lot of fleets which don't have many short trips.
    However, that doesn't mean that it's better, just that you can get away with
    using it. Try using 30W in this area in a time of year even close to winter
    and you'll destroy your engine from lack of lubrication in a hurry.
     
    Robert Hancock, Feb 10, 2004
    #32
  13. K2NNJ

    Steve Barker Guest

    Well this week it's been 0 to 32. Last summer was 105 at times.
     
    Steve Barker, Feb 10, 2004
    #33
  14. K2NNJ

    Steve Barker Guest

    You are correct in what you say. I loosely use the term "W" to mean
    "weight". Thus 30W = thirty weight oil. Sorry, and thanks for the english
    lesson. You know when you've been doing this shit as long as I have, you
    come to realize it really doesn't matter what you pour in there as long as
    you change it every 3000 miles.
     
    Steve Barker, Feb 10, 2004
    #34
  15. K2NNJ

    Steve Barker Guest

    whatever you say. I thought cold was cold wherever you are.
     
    Steve Barker, Feb 10, 2004
    #35
  16. K2NNJ

    Napalm Heart Guest

    Thank you for the civility. Might I ask what kind of trucks and
    engines you have been talking about?

    Ken
     
    Napalm Heart, Feb 10, 2004
    #36
  17. K2NNJ

    Napalm Heart Guest

    I know that I've had cars, trucks, and tractors that wouldn't have
    started in some of the coldest weather here (MI) with straight 30 in
    the crankcase. The 2 diesel Rabbits come quickly to mind. They had
    problems even using Mobil 1 5W-30.

    Ken
     
    Napalm Heart, Feb 10, 2004
    #37
  18. K2NNJ

    Steve Barker Guest

    Had to write the truck numbers down and think about it for a bit.<G>

    10- 302 Fords
    4- 318 mopars
    5- 5.9 cummins. one in a ford f-700 4 in dodges
    2- 4.6 fords
    1-7.3 naturally aspirated Navistar in a ford
    1-7.3 power joke ford
    1- 3.5 Cummins in an old bread van
    1- DT-466 international
    1- 460 Ford
    2- 5.8 fords
    2- 4.9 ford inline 6's
    1- 4.0 Ranger
    1- 2.3 Ranger
    1-3.? can't remember Chrysler 300M
    1-4.6 Mustang
    1-4.1 Cadillac


    Think that's it.
     
    Steve Barker, Feb 10, 2004
    #38
  19. K2NNJ

    Joe Dufu Guest

    10- 302 Fords
    I don't see any Saturns listed in there... What are you doing here?
    Aspiring to own smaller plastic vehicles?

    --



    Joe - V#8013 - '86 VN750 - joe @ yunx .com
    Ask me about "The Ride" on July 31, '04:
    http://www.youthelate.com/the_ride.htm

    I'm not a total idiot... I am after all, missing parts.
     
    Joe Dufu, Feb 10, 2004
    #39
  20. K2NNJ

    Napalm Heart Guest

    Let me answer here. These are the fleet vehicles. He has an SL1 as a
    personal vehicle.

    I disagree with his choice of 30 as a year-round lube, but as long as
    he is civil and doesn't descend to personal insults, I defend his
    right to post his opinions.

    Best Wishes,

    Ken
     
    Napalm Heart, Feb 11, 2004
    #40
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.