Oil for older engines?

Discussion in 'General Motoring' started by Barry Schnoor, May 11, 2004.

  1. Just heard a castrol ad on the radio for oil for older engines...preventing
    oil burnoff.

    My '94 (157,000 miles) SL2 used just over a quart between oil changes (2,500
    miles) when it was new. Now she's burning more. I'm using 10-30 oil.

    Anyone have experience with oil for high-mileage cars? Should I use 10-40?
    How about some of these additives that are on the market?

    Thanks.

    And thanks for all the help troubleshooting the whining noise in the engine.
    Turned out it was the idler pully. Piece of cake to change out once I
    removed the upper motor mount. I replaced the tensioner, too, while I was
    at it. $51, and an extra 45 minutes. Well worth it, I think.

    Barry
     
    Barry Schnoor, May 11, 2004
    #1
  2. Barry Schnoor

    Steve Guest

    I've had good luck using an engine flush (add to you oil, run 5 minutes,
    then change your oil and filter) then filling with Mobil 1. Cut my
    consumption in half.
     
    Steve, May 12, 2004
    #2
  3. Barry Schnoor

    Steve Barker Guest

    Straight 30 weight will work well. If it had been used from the get go, you
    probably wouldn't be using oil now. Those thin assed multi vis oils are
    worthless.
     
    Steve Barker, May 12, 2004
    #3
  4. Barry Schnoor

    C. E. White Guest

    At normal engine operating temperatures 5W30, 10W30, and
    straight 30 weight have almost identical viscosities. When
    cold, the 5W30 and 10W30 flow better than the straight 30
    weight. There are still applications for straight weight
    oil, but modern engines, as used by most people, aren't one
    of them.

    Regards,

    Ed White
     
    C. E. White, May 14, 2004
    #4
  5. Barry Schnoor

    Blah blah Guest

    That might be true if you lived somewhere where it was constantly hot!



    ....Cold starts, biggest wear factor on an engine. Why make it worse...
     
    Blah blah, May 14, 2004
    #5
  6. Barry Schnoor

    Steve Barker Guest

    Has worked fine here for 35 years. temps from minus 20 to 100+. 30 weight
    all year around in my personal vehicles AND the fleet of 35 I'm in charge
    of. Diesels, gassers, 4 cylinder up to DT466
     
    Steve Barker, May 14, 2004
    #6
  7. Barry Schnoor

    C. E. White Guest

    And I have been using multi-viscosity oil for 35
    years...including five different farm tractors with diesels.
    I've never had any sort of engine failure related to the
    oil.

    Regards,

    Ed White
     
    C. E. White, May 18, 2004
    #7
  8. Straight 30-weight is only thicker in cold temperatures, when you DON'T want
    it to be. There is no reason to use straight-weight oil in a modern engine.
     
    Robert Hancock, May 21, 2004
    #8
  9. Barry Schnoor

    Steve Barker Guest

    Wrong.

    --
    Steve Barker

    =========


    engine.
     
    Steve Barker, May 22, 2004
    #9
  10. Barry Schnoor

    Napalm Heart Guest

    Differing opinions.

     
    Napalm Heart, May 23, 2004
    #10
  11. Barry Schnoor

    Blah blah Guest

    Who cares. Keep using your so called straight "weight" oil. Anyone that
    uses "weight" as a way to discribe oil has already lost the argument
    anyhow.
     
    Blah blah, May 23, 2004
    #11
  12. Barry Schnoor

    C. E. White Guest

    Why is he wrong? I can't find one rational reason for
    typical drivers to use straight 30 weight in a modern
    engine. For engines that are in more or less continuous
    service, there is a small cost advantage to running straight
    30 weight, but I can't find any evidence that 5W30 doesn't
    provide superior performance to straight 30 weight of
    similar quality.

    Ed
     
    C. E. White, May 24, 2004
    #12
Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments (here). After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.